Re: Echolink and Metronet
By: Sean Dennis to Brian Indy on Wed Feb 16 2022 10:18 pm
> Thanks for the warning. CGNAT is one of the huge drawbacks of IPv6 and one
of the many reasons why I am not a fan of IPv6. I am
> Why in the hell they want $120 for a single static IP on an IPv6 network is
beyond me. Considering IPv6 can supposedly support 340
> trillion trillion trillion IP addresses, giving someone one static IP
shouldn't be much. Sounds like their main "front end" to the
> internet is IPv4 and they have very limited IPv4 addresses available to
them.
I'm thinking you've got confused.
CGNAT is an IPv4 solution due to the lack of IPv4 addresses - where the answer
is IPv6 isnt it?
I've not heard of ISP's selling single static IPv6 addresses - I thought most
gave you a /64, /60 or /56 as part of the service you get with them.
...δεσ∩
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509)
|