ml> or perhaps you misunderstood me? björn's patched makenl (2.51??)
ml> already allowed this years ago when he let it out for everyone to
ml> use... automatically and no config verbs or similar...
BF> Thanks mark, you are absolutely right.
you are welcome, björn ;)
BF> If every *C had used my patched version already from the Y2K
BF> change-over, we wouldn't have to debate this issue now.
yeah, and 12 years later, no less :/
BF> And what encoding to use? Who cares? Just let the fucking 128+
BF> characters pass, and let the users decide how to handle them! If
BF> you cannot see them as they were intended -- big deal. They would
BF> at least be more meaningful, than the present question marks, to
BF> many enough users.
exactly what i was trying to say :)
)\/(ark
---
* Origin: (1:3634/12.42)
|
